Palpatine thinks he is relevant to this.

  • Conyak@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    368
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or what? Is that supposed to be a threat? Seems to me that if a Republican is warning you not to investigate something then it definitely needs investigating.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      220
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think he’s implying that exposing the corruption will bring to light corrupt Democrats as well.

      Which is such a fucking typical conservative concept, as though the party should defend the corruption within by ignoring corruption everywhere. Jokes on you, motherfucker, because we want to expose and eliminate corruption among Democrats and Republicans.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          64
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Democrats are not on a cult.

          “Vote Blue No Matter Who” *is textbook cultish behavior and has lead to some truly awful candidacies.

          The post-Obama turn from casual social liberalism to BlueAnon party jingoism has been absolutely miserable for intra-party Democratic politics. The influx of Bill Kristol / Michael Bloomberg / Lincoln Project anti-Trump Republicans is a poison pill that’s going to do the same damage to the Dems that it did to the GOP under Bush.

          I’m already seeing all the toxicity and nastiness in local Dem organizing meetings that I remember my parents complaining about as liberal Republicans during the 2000-era turn.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            44
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The post-Obama turn from casual social liberalism to BlueAnon party jingoism has been absolutely miserable for intra-party Democratic politics. The influx of Bill Kristol / Michael Bloomberg / Lincoln Project anti-Trump Republicans is a poison pill that’s going to do the same damage to the Dems that it did to the GOP under Bush.

            This may top Mitch’s response as the dumbest take im going to read today

          • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a big difference between “always vote for the Democrat” and “always vote for Trump”.

            The only reason I voted blue last time around was because my third-party vote wasn’t anti-Trump enough in 2016. And I will continue voting blue until Republicans understand what Americans truly want from their politicians, and act accordingly. I will probably be voting blue for the rest of my life, but will be pleasantly surprised if there comes a time when I don’t have to.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s a big difference between “always vote for the Democrat” and “always vote for Trump”.

              A big chunk of the Trump electorate has been increasingly radicalized Republicans. Folks who genuinely believe Democrats are Satanic. The Trump movement works by tapping into this cohort and feeding on their intense anxiety.

              Democrats are getting a similar treatment, particularly as old GOP staffers change parties.

              I will continue voting blue until Republicans understand what Americans truly want from their politicians

              Doggedly putting up candidates like Kristen Sinema, Eric Adams, and Dianne Feinstein to high office won’t compel Republicans to change.

              One routinely sides with her conservative friends and calls it bipartisan, another feeds off blue lives matter jingoism and fuels the hysteria, and the third is too senile to present any kind of strategic opposition even presuming her politics don’t suck.

              There’s no future for progressive politics in a party that can win as Republican Lite.

              • teuast@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                i agree with some of what you said but i do have to mention that dianne feinstein has been dead for over a month

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the republicans will find something minor and insignificant about a democrat and make a massive deal about it as though they are equivalent issues.

        Like Biden’s classified document issue compared to Trumps. Then they say, “See? Both sides are basically the same”.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tbf, some Democrats don’t want it exposed, nor will resign when they are exposed. Some will run to their yacht to hide from angry constituents and not face intraparty opposition.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is that supposed to be a threat?

      “You won’t like me if I get… uncivil” is the most Senate threat in the book.

      Nevermind that we’ve got sitting Senators who have body-slammed journalists in recent memory.

  • Ænima@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dude, just fucking die already. I hope they double their efforts of subpoenas going forward. If a spotlight is cast on a Democrat, well call for their removal as well. Politics should not be a “get rich quick” scheme. You work for us, asshole, and it’s high time we reminded you/them of that fact.

    • spaceghoti@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s never been willing to work for the American people. Only the elite who can pay for his services.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      You work for us, asshole, and it’s high time we reminded you/them of that fact.

      Time to start flexing our muscles to remind these assholes of that fact.

      • WagesOf@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What muscles? Congress was created by an oligarchy to serve oligarchs and has never been anything else.

        Even the new deal was just a scheme to stop a guillotine party.

    • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t work for your just like Facebook or google don’t work for your, you are the merchandise they are selling.

      You are being pimped out. You are being sold down the river.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    1 year ago

    Palpatine thinks he is relevant to this.

    He KNOWS he’s relevant, that’s why he’s threat-begging them to look the other way.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get that he has to fight this, for political reasons, but this is the dumbest fucking rebuttal ever

    What he’s targeting here is private citizens with no legislative purpose. I think it’s completely and totally inappropriate,” McConnell said at a press conference Tuesday

    The Supreme Court is hardly your average citizen and Congress absolutely has reasons to investigate potential corrupt in the Supreme Court.

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 year ago

      Targeting a private citizen who was involved in bribing members of the Supreme Court of the United States. Somehow I think that second part might be relevant to Congress subpoenaing that “poor wittle pwivate citizen”

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also, calling billionaires “private citizens” seems wrong to me. If you’ve managed to hoard enough wealth to make a Tolkien dragon envious, you’re no longer a “private citizen” in my book. If I became an immortal being when Christ was born, started saving $10,000 a day every day, didn’t spend a single dime, and STILL don’t have your net worth today, over 2,000 years later - then fuck you - you’re not a “private citizen” you’re a god damn plague upon society that should be counting your blessings that guillotines went out of style a few centuries ago. As far as I’m concerned, billionaires should be in front of Congress every day explaining why they should be allowed to exist.

        • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          should be in front of Congress every day explaining why they should be allowed to exist.

          …once, until they’re entirely abolished. Billionaires are a policy failure.

    • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Congress is literally tasked with setting up the court system in the constitution. Through, you know, legislation. He’s talking out of his ass.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      also weird since he definitely thought it was worth it to probe hunter biden despite being a private citizen

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the billionaires he is saying are private citizens, he’s trying to protect his doners from humiliation

  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “What he’s targeting here is private citizens with no legislative purpose. I think it’s completely and totally inappropriate,” McConnell said at a press conference Tuesday.

    But Hunter Biden’s nudes blown up poster size for a Congressional inquiry without consent, without relevance, and without Hunter Biden ever having run for or being elected to public office is A-okay with the turtle. Hell, he was probably jealous he didn’t get to go to the presentation.

    Won’t someone please finally find this asshole’s last horcrux . . .

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    calling such a move “totally inappropriate.”

    And this from someone who openly, shamelessly rigs the court.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    McConnel warns to stop proving again and again how massive the corruption is in the republicans as there might be a democrat or two that might get swept up in it. I mean they got that guys son filling out the form wrong already.

  • DannyMac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What I want to know is what sort of cutting-edge medical voodoo based technology is keeping him alive?

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not even cutting edge. Just the normal shit everybody gets. We’re…REALLY good at keeping old people alive these days. Like shockingly good.

      Unfortunately in the case of some.

      Sincerely, a critical care nurse

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Walter Reed has the absolute best medical staff and facilities anywhere in the world.

        Meanwhile, one of the nurses at my family’s hospital decided it was okay to give my mother a double dose of chemo since she would be missing an appointment next month.

        • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Congress people have access to more consistent application of medical technology, yes. But the actual tech is not different from what is (sometimes poorly) deployed elsewhere. That was my only point.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is your mother aware that she probably needs the chemo to, you know, stay alive?

          Not sure what the schedule conflict there can be here.

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Is your mother aware that she probably needs the chemo to, you know, stay alive?

            Not sure what the schedule conflict there can be here.

            I am genuinely glad that you have never personally known someone who was actively undergoing chemo, and I hope that trend lasts for you.

            In the event it does not, you should know before you say something like this again that almost all traditional chemo is absolute poison (not all are, but most), and it is given on the principle that it kills cancer cells more quickly than healthy cells. Given enough time and in enough volume, it will kill ALL the cells. In most cases, you literally don’t need chemo to stay alive; you need to stay alive long enough to outrun the chemo. So the object is to try to time and dose it so that the majority of dying cells are the cancerous ones.

            It’s a delicate balance, or a calculated gamble, if you like. You’re literally making a bet with your life (and future health, if you survive) that you won’t cause as much harm to healthy cells as to cancerous ones, AND that what harm you do cause to healthy cells, you’ll have enough of an immune system left to rebuild or overcome.

            So to give someone a double dose is not only a masterpiece in stupidity and ignorance, it is a horrendously careless and life-endangering thing to do by someone who is actually paid to know better. I truly hope @kandoh@reddthat.com’s mom is doing okay and that somebody was able to stop that double-drip before it started. I can’t even imagine.

            EDITED to include post to which I replied, lol

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I’m aware. I’m talking about your mom missing her next scheduled dose.

              Obviously.

              You know, the way you would do if you want a resurgence?

              • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, I’m aware. I’m talking about your mom missing her next scheduled dose.

                Obviously.

                You know, the way you would do if you want a resurgence?

                I don’t usually quote short posts, but you’ve been editing and I wanted to preserve the natural unique quality of the iteration I answered, hope you don’t mind, @DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe

                1. Not my mom.
                2. “Next scheduled dose” is likely no longer an issue after a double dose.
                3. Obviously.
                4. You’ll have to ask her if she wants a resurgence, so many cancer patients do, social media loves to see you ring that bell so might as well do it as many times as you can, but to be clear a double dose probably resolved that too.
          • kandoh@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was 20 years ago so I don’t really remember why. It might have been radiation, not chemo, so there was less need for consistency

        • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          We regularly give the exact same treatment to Medicaid patients at my hospital that we give to rich patients. The key is being in a state with actually good Medicaid (Massachusetts). Lack of access in rural areas is more about corporations not making enough profit to continue providing services there. Which is why we need to make hospitals public again.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        My better half works in a nursing home and… agree. Too many are kept alive long after their minds and quality of life disappear.

        • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, the whole “occasionally torturing old people with dementia” part of my job is not what I signed up for when I became a nurse. But we continue to value the feelings of family members who might sue over the best interests of vulnerable patients. Welcome to America.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, Cheney is kept alive with technology, like Darth Vader. McConnell is kept alive through dark magic, like Emperor Palpatine. Totally different.

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mitch is afraid that the court they worked so hard to pack with their CORRUPT hacks will be undone.

  • Octavio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool, how about instead we focus on corruption in the department of transportation in, say, 2017-2021?

    • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the most important part. Whenever Republicans do shit like this, a Democrat, preferably a much younger one, should say, “I’d like to address the distinguished gentleman from Kentucky with the following question: Or you’ll what?” Call their bluff and watch them fold like this shit was a game of Texas Hold 'Em.