Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new “king”

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it’s an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

  • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh FFS, and here I was recently considering switching to ProtonMail… fuck the fuck off.

    Dear CEOs: if you’re eager to suck dick, I’m sure you can find someone better than authoritarian shitheads. Have some fucking standards.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    OK let me add fuel to the fire. here in Andy’s response he says the tweet was from last year which is technically true but it was from December 2024.

    Also how can he think that Trump stands for little guys when he has elon musk as his pet monkey

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’d actually be super useful if all of the VPN CEOs publicly stated which authoritarian leaders they are a fan of, so that consumers can make an informed choice on how easily they’ll sell you out to the security apparatus of your country.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just some advice for all of you affected by this.

    Begin demanding a response from the ownership of this company.

    “Is this Message approved by your board, and owners”

    Just leaving doesnt make a difference, and some of you in the comments bought services right before this. That fucking sucks.

    We dont have journalists and media on our side to help any more(arguably we never did, but that’s a separate discussion)

    I think there are still good bones in Proton, but you know where at least one piece cancer is, and its in the worst spot. Demand as stakeholders that they remove the cancer or admit its not going to happen. Repeat your messages until they publicy respond as a company not just the head of it.

    Its a shame if you dont do at least as much as expressing that they owe you an explanation and that you need the company as a whole, to why this had happened

    This is a betrayal to many of you, tell them exactly what they need to do

    Good luck. It only takes one of you to suceed and we all win

  • Jorn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I am dissapointed that my VPN is getting involved in US politics. This is not something I want for this kind of service. I dont want to debate US politics here. That being said, I cancelled my annual autorenew for April and I would like some recommendations. Originally I was deciding between Mulvad and Proton. I’ve also seen some people in this thread using Tuta? I am in Europe and just want a service that prioritizes anonyminity and data protection. I don’t know how the dust will settle on all this Proton stuff. What would you all recommend for a provider?

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    Extra weird because this is always the narrative, yet Trump could be any further from “standing up for the little guys” if he tried. It’s the same with the AfD in Germany, their voted policies (which is public as per the EU regulations) are as anti-consumer pro-corpo as you can be, even edging our truly crazy libertarian money sucker positions.

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      141
      ·
      4 days ago

      And then we have the communists making Lemmy. Is there any moderate developers lol. Valve is the only big company I can think of that isn’t annoying. All the faceless Linux devs are good too

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        98
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Glances at the child gambling enabled by the steam marketplace, an issue being blatantly ignored by Valve leadership.

        Buddy, I don’t know how to tell you this. I love Valve for all the good they do, but they got some serious skeletons, too.

        Valve representatives were asked point blank if the third party gambling sites have a positive influence on their bottom line, and the dude replying sweated bullets for several seconds before nervously going “we… don’t have any data on that” while the rest stared daggers at him.

        Coffeezilla has a recent video on the situation.

        • fleet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I love Steam, but thinking about switching to gog over this. Anybody have any ideas how we can let valve know this isn’t okay?

          • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            I did this years ago and have like 500 games on GOG. Ended up going back to Steam due to features that gog just doesn’t have. Sigh.

            • fleet@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I have a feeling I would feel the same. Its nice having everything in one place. What was missing for you?

              • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                All the social features, the workshop, easy browsing, and guides just off the top of my head. GOG is still good for those really retro 90s and early 2000s games though

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I mean I always use GoG, if given the option. But there’s almost always no GoG option. Publishers want some form of DRM.

        • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I understand your frustration but I’m not casting some wide net here. I’m simply talking about political ideologies being in your face.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If it’s between fascism and communism, the answer is pretty fucking simple imo. Only one of those ideologies considers all people to be equal.

        And no, I am not a communist, and I would not choose communism unless it was the only alternative to fascism.

        • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Totally understand what you’re saying. Obviously I am on Lemmy. Just wish we didn’t have ideologies in our face all the time

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          4 days ago

          I have a bigger fear of what happens to Linux when Torvalds retires. He took a break a while back, and it was an absolute shit show of a power struggle.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Give some credit. Even if they aren’t politically aligned with your, they did make Lemmy open source for others to run with.

        • Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          117
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          I wouldn’t call it “writing on the wall,” but they have done some not-so-good things over the last few years:

          1. Handing over data for their email services (which was legally required) (ref).
          2. Releasing a Bitcoin wallet. The problem for me is that Bitcoin is inherently not private.
          3. Lying in marketing. Proton claims “no data or speed limits” for their free VPN (ref), which is just plain wrong. If you download a few gigs, it will slow you down to a few Mbit (if I remember correctly). I even contacted their support about this, and they just said, “They are balancing the servers for the free VPN.” But then why was it fast in the beginning, and if I reconnected to the same server, would it be fast again. Just to be clear: I have no problem with the speed limit/balancing itself, just that they are lying about it.
          4. Proton incentivizing free email accounts to connect to a Gmail account to get 500 MB more storage. (You need to go through the “tutorial” steps to get the 500 MB extra, and one of them is to have a Google Mail account send all their emails to your new Proton inbox.)

          This is why I personally decided against Proton.

          • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            61
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            These are useful data for making decisions about using their service, but not exactly indicative of support for a right wing authoritarian leader who lies more in one day than he has hairs on his entire body.

            Edit: typo

            • Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              47
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Mostly true, that’s why I opened with “I wouldn’t call it writing on the wall.” But for me, it shows that they are not as privacy- and consumer-focused as they like to present themselves. Supporting Trump is just five steps further in this direction. (That’s just how I feel about it.)

              • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                27
                ·
                4 days ago

                that’s why I opened with “I wouldn’t call it writing on the wall.”

                Damn; you’re right. My bad. I somehow missed your opener saying exactly the opposite of what you were saying.

                Everything you said is true and verifiable, and worth considering when you decide which service to use. It’s a lot of reasons to favor the .onion/tor version of their service to limit what they have access to depending on your privacy stance.

          • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            4 days ago

            Woah… an actually rock-solid account of problems with Proton! Nicely done.

            This contrasts with the incoherent conspiracy theory spaghetti that has sometimes been trotted out to make the case against them.

          • sudneo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            1,2 and 3 are completely irrelevant. 1 is completely normal, 2 missed the point that the wallet (which I don’t use, I never owned crypto) has nothing to do with privacy and 4 is an optional marketing strategy to incentivise migration from google. Nothing is wrong with any of this.

            • Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Drive - Selfhosted Nextcloud

              Email - Posteo/Tuta

              VPN - Cryptostorm (IVPN/Mullvad are more user friendly)

              Passwords - Keepass (Sync over my Nextcloud.)

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            This is interesting. I’m current using btguard, but was thinking about other vpn providers. I have a free protonmail email account and was wondering about their vpn service. Sounds like they are not so privacy oriented. And I assume NordVPN is a similar story?

            • Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 days ago

              Well, I’d say Proton is still better than most other options (open-source software, no ad trackers on the website and in apps). However, specifically for VPNs, I would recommend Mullvad or IVPN. If you are a bit more tech-savvy, you may also take a look at Cryptostorm. Of all three, only Mullvad is police-raid-proven to not store logs or other PII. The most important thing for me personally would be that the VPN company is not owned by a larger parent company, which in turn owns multiple different VPN providers. This alone excludes a lot of the heavily advertised providers (Private Internet Access, NordVPN, Surfshark, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, OVPN, and probably a few more).

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          44
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          They’ve been cooperating with law enforcement and handing data to the cops proactively since 2021.

          Pay attention.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    So Proton is out.

    Sorry, I won’t trust a service that licks fascist boots.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    204
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Standing up for the little guy. Huh. Is that why billionaires and CEO are throwing literal tens of millions at Trump? Why he staffed his cabinet with billionaires? Why the center of his policy is tax cuts for the giga wealthy, at the expense of everyone else and the national debt, at a time where wealth inequality is literally tearing the country apart?

    https://www.axios.com/2025/01/15/trump-windfall-fundraising-500-million

    https://www.axios.com/2024/12/09/trump-wealth-cabinet-politicians-billionaires

    These are objective, public facts. Like, I’m way more conservative than Lemmy’s center and willing acknowledge any good Trump does, but what reality is this guy living in? Who is this statement for? Who the heck does he think is using Proton services? He just pissed off his employees and customers for… What?

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Probably doesn’t want to get banned in the US… Or so my copium tells me.

      Silver lining is that Proton is owned by a non-profit.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        4 days ago

        I was thinking this for a second, but is this really plausible? Normally when we talk about corporations we talk about how powerful they are and how they use different nations to locate headquarters and offices in order to mitigate legal and tax obligations. We regularly talk about how governments can’t reign them in and how they act with impunity.

        But now? “They HAVE to capitulate. They are just doing it to survive.” Really? Do we really believe that? Or is it more likely that this is what they want and if they didn’t, they’d be fighting tooth and nail to stop it? I’m with the second option honestly.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s what I don’t get. If the proton CEO was actually raging MAGA, the last thing he should do, strategically, is stoke fires by stirring this up. That’s business 101.

          …He must want conservative’s ears for some kind of policy issue, maybe to the detriment of Proton’s competitors. But what?

    • Unquote0270@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Seems a lot of people share this view that somehow he’s for the little guy, despite quite clearly being for the opposite. It’s the same over the pond, there’s a paranoia held by many that the government is out to persecute the common people. Very strange on both sides, it’s almost Orwell levels of Newspeak.

  • pfr@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    They’re is no way Trump wrote that tweet. It is full of punctuation and clearly gets a point across. It was clearly written by someone else. Nevertheless, time to delete protonmail.

  • egerlach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    4 days ago

    The official @protonprivacy@mastodon.social account replied and doubled down

    protonprivacy@mastodon.social - @jonah

    Corporate capture of Dems is real. In 2022, we campaigned extensively in the US for anti-trust legislation.

    Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote.

    At a 2024 event covering antitrust remedies, out of all the invited senators, just a single one showed up - JD Vance.

    1/2

    protonprivacy@mastodon.social - @jonah By working on the front lines of many policy issues, we have seen the shift between Dems and Republicans over the past decade first hand.

    Dems had a choice between the progressive wing (Bernie Sanders, etc), versus corporate Dems, but in the end money won and constituents lost.

    Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.

    2/2

    (Less importantly, my response)